Страницы
▼
Friday, May 20, 2016
This I Believe About Literature
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxZwMptvtN5IbnZyR2FrMG5NekE/view?usp=sharing
Monday, May 16, 2016
The Four Words You Missed
Inside our authorized text of The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald the dedication read, “Once
again to Zelda”. The narrative begins here. Forget the first chapter or first
sentence of the first chapter, the takeoff has already happened. By the time
you get to the first word of The Great
Gatsby the story is already in full swing, the only question is, “Did you
miss it?” According to the Cultural Poetics lens, this part of writing, before
the fiction begins, is where the true soul and meaning of the work can be
found. From this perspective, Fitzgerald’s dedication is the doorway to discovering
the meaning of his work as we analyze The
Great Gatsby and try to understand Fitzgerald’s societal concerns.
Remembering that any text is a social document that
responds and reflects a social and historical situation I took it a step
further and assumed that the author through his writing both consciously and
subconsciously reflects not only the big picture of society before him, but
also the diminutive details of his personal life story. The dedication
obviously suggests that Zelda, whoever she may be is an important part of
Fitzgerald’s personal story and thus he couldn’t help but write her into the
novel. This led me to study Fitzgerald’s personal life and specifically his
love story with Zelda, in the effort to answer the question of what type of
behavior and lifestyle is being promoted and supported in the pages of The Great Gatsby, as well as who is
being blamed or praised as the story of the roaring twenties unfolds. Understanding
the biographical facts that are relevant to the text is my in to correctly
interpreting The Great Gatsby’s
message.
After a lot of research I realized that the
relationship and then the marriage of Fitzgerald and Zelda was very
complicated, much more complex than I expected it to be. Be that as it may, I
also came to realize that all I was looking for where the overlying themes
pronounced in their relationship and major events that I could find projections
of in The Great Gatsby, for seeing
Fitzgerald’s attitude to those themes and incidents in his life would clue me in
on the things he was promoting or condemning in his writing.
Using the broadest of strokes, Zelda was the wife and
muse of F. Scott Fitzgerald. He first met her in 1918, and was so enamored by
her that he redrafted one of his female characters after her in This Side of Paradise. Furthermore, it
is said that their first encounter was recorded by Fitzgerald in his
description of when Jay Gatsby first met Daisy Buchanan. However, this proves
to be just one of many instances in The
Great Gatsby when Fitzgerald used semi-autobiographical content in
constructing the tragic love story.
In 1920, by sending his mother’s ring to Zelda in the
mail, the couple got engaged. Nevertheless in the time following that, Fitzgerald
failed at convincing Zelda that he would be able to support her and their
lifestyle, leading in turn to her breaking off the engagement. After months of
work and struggling to keep himself afloat, which even including repairing car
roofs, Fitzgerald published This Side of
Paradise, which became an immediate financial success and led to the
reengagement of the couple, as Zelda took this for proof of a financial stable
future in marriage.
I have to say that reading The Great Gatsby for the first time, I didn’t care or wasn’t
interested enough to google who Zelda was or why the book was dedicated to her.
Yet when I discovered who Zelda was and learned these details of Fitzgerald’s
and Zelda’s lives, my interpretation changed completely. The message I began
receiving at second glance warped into something opposite. After my first time
through the story, I believed that Fitzgerald was condemning the sort of
lifestyle he portrayed in Jay Gatsby, Daisy and Tom Buchanan’s lives. How could
he possibly stand behind Gatsby who spent all of his life trying to earn a
fortune to be with the woman he loves, and behind Gatsby’s attitude towards
Daisy, if in the end Gatsby loses everything? How could Fitzgerald possibly
justify or sympathize or even understand a woman like Daisy, who welcomes her
daughter into the world with, “I hope she'll be a fool—that's the best thing a
girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool” and who is tossed from one
man to another by the winds of financial gain?
He couldn’t. Thus The
Great Gatsby couldn’t be reinforcing or even condoning this sort of stance
on life. It must be meant to break the illusions the readers would have had of
the roaring twenties, to show the lives of the wealthy when they are stripped
of the glitz and the bling, to present a descriptive lesson to its audience
about the value of life. The tragic undertones are ever present in Gatsby and
how anyone could ever make different conclusions, astounded me.
In this analysis of The Great Gatsby, guided by some of the assumptions and
methodologies of Cultural Poetics, informed of the complex story of Scott and
Zelda, I have come to believe something entirely different about this novel. Learning
that Fitzgerald, like Gatsby, had to slave away and wait for the love of his
life gave me a perspective on what the author was communicating through his
fictional character. Realizing that Fitzgerald, like a combination of Gatsby
and Buchanan, was in love and married to a “Daisy” (for the infamous words
about the baby girl were a direct quote from Zelda upon the birth of her
daughter) affected how harshly I judged Daisy, her relationships and her choices.
Understanding that Fitzgerald, like Nick Caraway, was documenting in his
writing not only the society around him, but also his own partaking in it,
added meaning and made me question my concluding thoughts of what the work was
trying to convey, what it was supporting and who it was blaming.
I have come to believe that Fitzgerald is condemning
neither Gatsby nor Daisy, not even Tom Buchanan really, but is rather putting
to paper the odds he and Zelda had beat by ending up together. It does not
reinforce or endorse the models practiced by Gatsby or the Buchanans, because
their consequences often follow the tragic pattern described, yet they are not
clearly condemned either because they are projections of Fitzgerald’s own life
and sort of worked out for him. Although no character is constantly praised
throughout the pages of The Great Gatsby,
not a single one is condemned either. This is obvious in the amount of
passivity and aloofness in the author’s treatment of both Myrtle’s and Gatsby’s
death, as well as the Buchanans’ move to Europe and Daisy’s estrangement to
Gatsby even in his death.
These are of course are only the shallows of the
interpretations of The Great Gatsby.
There are many more layers to the story of Zelda and Fitzgerald. There are innumerable
nuances and controversies that could add to the analysis of this great literary
work. However those described in the pages above are those that have helped me
take a fresh view at what I was reading and these are the historical details
that morphed my understanding of what and how F. Scott Fitzgerald was
communicating in the pages of The Great
Gatsby. For this reason, I did not and will not go more in depth into Scott’s
and Zelda’s relationship. Thus I believe this conclusion and my current
understanding of the literary work is appropriate when taking into account the
tools and materials I have been working with.